An Evaluation of Kernel Equating: Parallel Equating With Classical Methods in the SAT Subject TestsTM Program

ETS, the ETS logo, and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). PRAXIS is a trademark of ETS. SAT SUBJECT TESTS and SAT REASONS TESTS are trademarks of the College Board. PSAT/NMSQT is a registered trademark of the College Board and the National Merit Scholarship Corporation As part of its nonprofit mission, ETS conducts and disseminates the results of research to advance quality and equity in education and assessment for the benefit of ETS's constituents and the field. ETS Research Reports provide preliminary and limited dissemination of ETS research prior to publication. To obtain a PDF or a print copy of a report, please visit: Abstract This study investigated kernel equating methods by comparing these methods to operational equatings for two tests in the SAT Subject Tests™ program. GENASYS (ETS, 2007) was used for all equating methods and scaled score kernel equating results were compared to Tucker, Levine observed score, chained linear, and chained equipercentile equating results. The results of the kernel chained equatings using a large fixed bandwidth were nearly identical to the results from the chained linear equatings whereas the comparisons of the kernel poststratification equatings using a large bandwidth showed differences from both Tucker and Levine observed score equating results, although for most of the score range those differences were small. Similarly, the differences were small for most of the score range in the comparisons of kernel poststratification equatings and kernel chained equatings using the optimal bandwidth with chained equipercentile equatings.